Legal Opinion

LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 1, 1955No. 36,474, 36,475PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeals from judgments of the district court in favor of plaintiffs in two actions consolidated for trial and on appeal. Phyllis LeMay brought an action to recover for personal injuries, and her husband, Gerald LeMay, brought an action for derivative damages.

Phyllis LeMay, referred to hereinafter as plaintiff, was injured in an accident which occurred at about 6:11 p. m. on October 13, 1948, on the south crosswalk of the intersection of Emerson avenue north and Twenty-ninth avenue north in Minneapolis. Emerson avenue runs generally north and south, and Twenty-ninth…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ahlstrom v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Rodgers v. BoyntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  3. Olson v. MullenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  4. Lundblad v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Southern Coach Lines, Inc. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sauter v. WasemillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. J. Paul Smith Co. v. TiptonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  4. Kwapien v. StarrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Parr v. CloutierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API