Legal Opinion

Amante v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1990No. S008853PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

We review today the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (review department) that petitioner Paul Amante, Jr. (Amante), be suspended from the practice of law in the State of California for three years, that execution of the order for such suspension be stayed, and that Amante be placed on probation for said period of three years upon conditions including an actual suspension from the practice of law for the first six months of such probation. After considering all the evidence and petitioner’s contentions, we adopt the recommendation of the review…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re HigbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re NaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Grim v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kaplan v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sugarman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API