Legal Opinion

Sugarman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1990No. S013299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court that petitioner Alan C. Sugarman be suspended from the practice of law for three years, that execution of the order for such suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be placed on probation for three years on conditions including an actual suspension from the practice of law for the first year of probation. After considering all the evidence and petitioner’s contentions, we adopt the recommendation of the review department.

I. Findings of Fact

Petitioner was admitted to the practice of law on December…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Chefsky v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Baker v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lipson v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Read v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API