Grim v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
—We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (review department) that petitioner Douglas Paul Grim be disbarred from the practice of law for having wilfully misappropriated over $5,500 of client funds.
Petitioner contends that disbarment is excessive. He argues that the review department’s conclusions of law are unsupported by the evidence, that it failed to properly weigh the evidence, and that it failed to appropriately weigh mitigating and aggravating circumstances. He maintains that the interests of the public and the profession can be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lawhorn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- McKnight v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re VeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
- State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. VeithNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Kelly v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.