Legal Opinion
Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. Kleinman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 24, 1925No. 24,905PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action to cancel a mortgage as usurious. The issue as to usury was submitted to a jury which found there was none. The court found for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
In 1923 the plaintiff was constructing an apartment building in, St. Paul. There was upon it a first mortgage of $54,000. More money was needed. On June 25, 1923, the plaintiff without consideration executed to Joseph Supornick a second mortgage for $28,000. This is the mortgage which the plaintiff claims is usurious. It was recorded June 27, 1923. On June 28, 1923, an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State Bank v. StrandbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Fredin v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Jackson v. TravisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Miller v. MacAlester CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Capitol National Bank & Trust Co. v. David B. Roberts, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Stone v. MacQuarrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.