Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Travis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court for Hennepin county, when the action was tried by Smith, J.

1Opinion of the CourtGileillan, C. J.

This is an action to cancel a certain note and a mortgage of real estate to secure it, (the note executed bv the nlaintiff George, and the mortgage by. both. -plaintiffs, to the defendant Travis, and bv him transferred to the, other defendants,) on the ground that they are usurious. The court below found as facts, and the evidence justifies the findings, in substance that the note and the mortgage in question, with two other mortgages given in terms to secure the note, the defendant Travis being named as payee in the note and mortgagee in the mortgages, were executed without any consideration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lukens v. HazlettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. American Inv. Co. v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Patterson v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Swanson v. Realization & Debenture Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API