State Bank v. Strandberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for "Wright county to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent as against creditors. The facts are given at the beginning of the opinion. The case was tried before Giddings, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying its motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
Action to set aside a conveyance as fraudulent as to creditors. The issues were submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying a new trial.
Defendants, John and Selma Strandberg, are husband and wife. They were married in 1896. In that same year Peter Strandberg, the father of John, was injured so that from then on until his death, some six years later, he was as helpless as an infant, and his care was a most arduous and disagreeable task. He lived with the young people, but the burden of his care fell to Selma. Peter owned a farm of 90…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trenton Passenger Railway Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
- McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Veum v. SheeranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Hier v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Fredin v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Anderson v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Morrow v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- LaBelle v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Sund v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.