Legal Opinion

Graves v. Bonness

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1906No. Nos. 14,443—(48)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin • county to recover from •defendant a balance of $73,842.73 alleged to be due for saw logs sold -and delivered. The case was tried before Simpson, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $37,827.23. From an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.

This was an action brought to recover payment for three seasons’ •cut of saw logs, delivered by the plaintiff and respondent to defendant and appellant. Plaintiff demanded judgment for $73,842.73. The answer prayed the judgment of the court that the plaintiff recover against the defendant the sum of $584.62, and no more. The main issue tried to a jury concerned'the contract between the parties. The jury brought in a verdict of $37,827.23. From an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, this appeal was taken.

*2801. The principal assignment of error was addressed to a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Burton v. DriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Noonan v. Caledonia Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Wood v. WeimarSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Willard v. PikeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goss v. GossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. McDonald v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Adelmann v. Elk River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Larson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API