McDonald v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover commissions which the plaintiff claims are due to him from the defendant for finding a purchaser for certain pine timber belonging to the defendant. Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $12,058.84. The defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for judgment or for a new trial.
*43The complaint alleges two causes of action. The allegations as to the first one are to the effect that the defendant employed and authorized the plaintiff to find a purchaser for him for the Norway and white pine timber standing on the lands described in the schedule attached to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamlin v. SchulteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Baars v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Graves v. BonnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Grosse v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Vaughan v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Lake Company v. MolanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Anderson v. Wallowa National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Glassman v. BarronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Huntley v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.