Legal Opinion

Board of Public Utilities v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1934No. 31,790PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This appeal presents the question whether a city which owns its electric light and power plant requires a certificate of convenience from the state corporation commission before it can extend its transmission lines and services outside the corporate limits of the municipality.

For some years past the city of Kansas City has owned and operated its light plant. The plant was constructed and from time to time has been enlarged with funds derived from the sale of bonds issued by the city under various statutes. At this time bonds so issued and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Humphrey v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Service Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. City of McPhersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Becker v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Seely v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API