Legal Opinion

Seely v. Board of Public Utilities

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1936No. 32,831PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

This was an action for damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff, Joseph E. Seely, by Coming in contact with a broken high-tension wire of the municipal light and power plant in Kansas City.

In a certain section of Kansas City there is a street named Willard avenue, which runs east and west. It is intersected by Wood*966land avenue, which runs north and south. In the block immediately east of Woodland and north of. Willard is an alley fifteen feet wide. About forty feet north of Willard, in this alley, on July 6, 1934, there stood an elm tree,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  2. Stone v. City of PleasantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. McCombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  4. Foley v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murphy v. City of TopekaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  2. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. City of Wichita v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  4. Gilmore v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. Hubert v. Board of Public UtilitiesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API