Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 8, 1956No. 40,271PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, C. J.:
This is an original action in mandamus by the state on the relation of the attorney general and the corporation commission. An alternative writ was issued. The four defendants filed motions to quash the writ. The cause was finally submitted on such motions pursuant to an order of this court.
The petition alleged various powers of the commission, among them the supervision of the disposition of franchises and properties and the termination of services and the fixing of rates and charges; that defendant Sinclair Pipe Line Company, which will…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- National Ass'n of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
- Summers v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Cities Service Gas Co. v. State Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Continental Pipe Line Co. v. Belle Fourche Pipeline Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.