Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1974No. Sac. 8001PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

We deal here with a so-called “due-on” clause commonly used in security transactions in real property to provide, at the option of the lender, for the acceleration of the maturity of the loan upon the sale, alienation, or further encumbering of the real property security. In La Sala v. American Sav. & Loan Assn. (1971) 5 Cal.3d 864 [97 Cal.Rptr. 849, 489 P.2d 1113] we concluded that while the lender may insist on the automatic enforcement of such a clause upon the occurrence of ah outright sale by the trustor-obligor, he may not exercise such an absolute power upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Cherry v. Home Savings & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Carma Developers (California), Inc. v. Marathon Development California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wellenkamp v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API