Legal Opinion

Wadsworth v. Moe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1972No. 244PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

A single issue is dispositive of this appeal:

Is the “Real Estate Option” void under the statute of frauds, sec. 240.08?

An option to purchase real estate which does not conform to the statute of frauds is void and a nullity. That statute, sec. 240.08, provides:

“Contract for lease or sale to be in writing. Every contract for the leasing for a longer period than one year or for the sale of any lands or any interest in lands shall be void unless the contract or some note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and be subscribed by the party by whom the lease or sale is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Messer v. OestreichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bratt v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Inglis v. FoheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Docter v. HellbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wiegand v. GissalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zapuchlak v. HucalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Clay v. BradleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Trimble v. Wisconsin Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Edlebeck v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. 303, LLC v. BornCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API