Legal Opinion

Clay v. Bradley

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1976No. 733 (1974)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The principal questions on this appeal are first, whether a contract for the sale of real estate was vitiated under the statute of frauds because the land description was indefinite and second, whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s award of damages. Other issues are discussed in this opinion.

The appeal is from a judgment supporting an award of damages by a jury in favor of the respondent-purchaser (“plaintiff”) under a purchase and sale agreement for the failure of appellant-seller (“defendant”) to transfer title. The action was brought for specific performance which the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Terpstra v. Soiltest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rossow Oil Co. v. HeimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kelly v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Todorovich v. Kinnickinnic Mutual Loan & Building Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wadsworth v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. McGarrity v. Welch Plumbing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rolfs v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  4. Spensley Feeds, Inc. v. Livingston Feed & Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Brevig v. WebsterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API