Legal Opinion

Trimble v. Wisconsin Builders, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1976No. 648 (1974)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The jury in this case found that two writings, subscribed to by the plaintiff, E. C. Trimble, and Wisconsin Builders, Inc., by its president, R. D. Trebilcox, constituted a contract by which part ownership of a building erected by Wisconsin Builders was to be conveyed to Trimble. The trial judge declined to enter a directed verdict for the defendant and sustained the jury’s verdict for the plaintiff. We conclude that the writings were insufficient under the statute of frauds and that a directed verdict and judgment should have been entered for the defendant. We reverse.

The facts adduced at…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Witt v. Realist, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Wiegand v. GissalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Stuesser v. EbelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Durkin v. MacheskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Thiel v. JahnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michael J. Winger v. Susan M. WingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Zapuchlak v. HucalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Rollie Winter Agency, Inc. v. First Central Mortgage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Charles Bich v. WW3 LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025
  5. Rameker v. Peterson (In Re Associated Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API