Legal Opinion

Wiegand v. Gissal

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1965PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPIeffernan, J.

The first question to be decided is whether the description of the property is so inadequate as to be void under the statute of frauds. The statute (sec. 240.08, Stats.) provides:

“Contract for lease or sale to be in writing. Every contract for the leasing for a longer period than one year or for the sale of any lands or any interest in lands shall be void unless the contract or some note or memorandum thereof, expressing the consideration, be in writing and be subscribed by the party by whom the lease or sale is to be made or by his lawfully authorized agent.”

In order to satisfy the statute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harney v. BurhansWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stuesser v. EbelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Kelly v. SullivanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Thiel v. JahnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Sanderson v. DoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ziegler Co., Inc. v. Rexnord, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schwochert v. American Family Mutual Ins.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Powalka v. State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bunbury v. KraussWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Rossow Oil Co. v. HeimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API