Legal Opinion

Edlebeck v. Barnes

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1974No. 328PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

When the affidavits and pleadings reveal there are disputed issues of material fact a motion for summary judgment must be denied. When the trial court is of the opinion that there are or may be material disputed facts or conflicting permissible inferences can arise from undisputed facts and denies a motion for summary judgment on that ground, this court, in a vast majority of those cases, will not interfere with the trial court’s discretion. Likewise, when it reasonably appears doubtful to the trial court as to what law should apply, especially to complicated facts, an order denying a motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. v. SchugWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Townsend v. La Crosse Trailer Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Wadsworth v. MoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v. MussallemWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Poston v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  3. Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kroske v. Anaconda American Brass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ramsden v. Hawkinson Gas Service Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API