Legal Opinion

Zapuchlak v. Hucal

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1978No. 75-638PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Three issues are presented on this appeal:

1. Is the land contract void for failure to satisfy the statute of frauds ?

2. Did the trial court err in adopting the legal description suggested by the vendees?

3. Did the trial court err in denying the vendors’ motion to review the judgment?

Statute of Frauds and Legal Description

The question of whether the description of the excluded property covered by the land contract satisfied the statute of frauds arises in this case because of the relief sought. Here, by amended complaint, the vendees sought the specific performance of the land contract insofar…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Amidzich v. Charter Oak Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wiegand v. GissalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Paterson v. PatersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Stuesser v. EbelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. First National Bank of Kenosha v. ScalzoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. D.S.A. v. Circuit Court Branch 1, Rock County Juvenile Probation Department, John Whitcomb and Donald HanawayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Beverly Maeker v. William Ross (072185)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  3. In Matter of Adoption of RPRWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Prezioso v. AertsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  5. Charles Bich v. WW3 LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API