Legal Opinion

Oganov v. American Family Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 2009No. A07-929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

In October 2006, appellant Sergey Oga-nov filed a lawsuit against respondent American Family Insurance Group (American Family) alleging that he was entitled to uninsured motorist (UM) benefits that arose from a January 1999 automobile accident. American Family moved for summary judgment, arguing among other things that Oganov’s claim was time-barred by the six-year statute of limitations. Oganov responded that his UM claim did not accrue until the tortfeasor’s insurer became insolvent, either when the insurer was placed in “rehab” in April 2002, or when it was declared…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Kraly v. VannewkirkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API