Legal Opinion

Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2016No. A14-1189PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

This case requires us to determine the accrual date of a claim for excess uninsured motorist (“UM”) benefits under the Minnesota No-Fault Act, MinmStat. §§ 65B.41-.71 (2014). Appellant Jamy Hegseth brought a lawsuit against her insurer, respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Group (“American Family”), seeking excess UM benefits for injuries arising out of a 2007 motor vehicle collision. After settling her primary UM claim, Hegseth brought suit against American Family for excess UM benefits. The district court granted American Family’s motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Employers Mutual Companies v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. O'Neill v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harstad v. City of WoodburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  2. Jennissen v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
  3. Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  4. Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Scott County Hudson, C.J. Tyrel Lamar Patterson v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API