Legal Opinion

Benigni v. County of St. Louis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 15, 1998No. C5-97-2240PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant argues that the tax court erred in hearing respondent’s motion for summary judgment, granting summary judgment for respondent, dismissing many of appellant’s claims, and failing to assess costs. We conclude that the tax court did not err in any of its rulings, and accordingly affirm.

I

In January 1995, the local property assessor increased the 1995 estimated market values (EMVs) on four plots of land in Cotton Township owned by appellant Kenneth S. Benigni, affecting the property taxes payable in 1996. Benigni appealed the assessor’s determination of his properties’ 1995 EMVs…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Rosvall v. ProvostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by45 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Noske v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  3. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API