Benigni v. County of St. Louis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellant argues that the tax court erred in hearing respondent’s motion for summary judgment, granting summary judgment for respondent, dismissing many of appellant’s claims, and failing to assess costs. We conclude that the tax court did not err in any of its rulings, and accordingly affirm.
I
In January 1995, the local property assessor increased the 1995 estimated market values (EMVs) on four plots of land in Cotton Township owned by appellant Kenneth S. Benigni, affecting the property taxes payable in 1996. Benigni appealed the assessor’s determination of his properties’ 1995 EMVs…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Rosvall v. ProvostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Continental Sales & Equipment Co. v. Town of StuntzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Rice Lake Contracting Corp. v. Rust Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by45 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty v. Aquila Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Noske v. FriedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Langer v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.