Legal Opinion

Kraly v. Vannewkirk

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1994No. 92-2307PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtA. William Sweeney, J.

I

The threshold question presented by this action concerns the extent to which the amendment of pleadings adding parties may relate back to the date of the original filing. Civ.R. 15(C) governs this issue. It provides in relevant part:

“Relation Back of Amendments. Whenever the claim or defense asserted in the amended pleading arose out of the conduct, transaction, or occurrence set forth or attempted to be set forth in the original pleading, the amendment relates back to the date of the original pleading. An amendment changing the party against whom a claim is asserted relates back if the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. WolfeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. TomanskiOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Colvin v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Duriak v. Globe American Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. State v. GwynneOhio Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Landis v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. A.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Miller v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API