Legal Opinion
Strickland v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 24, 2009No. 07-1082PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Carole Strickland brought various state and federal claims against Defendant-Appellee United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) after she stopped working for UPS. The only claims at issue in this appeal are claims of retaliation for utilizing the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654, and sex discrimination. After Strickland presented her case at trial, the district court granted judgment as a matter of law to UPS on both claims. The district court ruled Strickland’s FMLA retaliation claim failed as a matter of law because she could…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. PVNF, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- MacKenzie v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Gail Derr v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Exum v. United States Olympic CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Walker v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Administrative Review BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Rivero v. Univ. N.M. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Taylor v. Giant of Maryland, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Gerald v. LocksleyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Narotzky v. Natrona County Memorial Hospital Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.