Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Giant of Maryland, LLC

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 2011No. 9, 10, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

We are asked to review a jury verdict in favor of the Petitioner, Julia M. Taylor, an African American female, in a suit in which she alleged both sexual discrimination and retaliatory termination against Giant of Maryland LLC, Respondent. 1 The focal point of our review of the discrimination verdict is the application of “comparator evidence” 2 in the context of Ms. Taylor’s claim of disparate treatment related to Giant’s requirement that she undergo an independent medical examination because of a gynecological condition. We also must determine whether Ms. Taylor adduced legally sufficient…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Deluxe Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2019
  2. CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Blakes v. City of HyattsvilleDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Edgewood Management Corp. v. JacksonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Doe v. Catholic Relief ServicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API