Legal Opinion

Lockheed Martin Corp. v. Administrative Review Board

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2013No. 11-9524PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

I. Introduction

Lockheed Martin Corp. (“Lockheed”) seeks to set aside a decision of the Administrative Review Board of the Department of Labor (the “ARB” or the “Board”) concluding Lockheed violated Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley” or the “Act”). See 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(a). The Board affirmed the decision of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”), who concluded Lockheed violated the Act by constructively discharging employee Andrea Brown after she had engaged in protected activity. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1514A(b)(2)(A)…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. AECOM Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Lawson v. FMR LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Andrea Jones v. Southpeak Interactive CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Jeffrey Wiest v. Tyco Electronics CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API