Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. Britton

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 14, 1948No. 9629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Associate Justice.

Appellant, Emily Wetzel, filed a bill of complaint on September 6, 1946, in the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia seeking injunctive relief from an order entered by appellee Britton, as Deputy Commissioner, rejecting appellant’s claim for compensation under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 (The Deputy Commissioner stated in his order that the claim was rejected for the reason “That the injury did not arise out of and in the course of the employment.”)2 The bill of complaint named as parties defendant Theodore…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Bountiful Brick Co. v. GilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Hurley v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Dixie Sand & Gravel Corporation v. Pauline HollandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  3. Jean Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. Hay v. Travelers Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Shoemaker v. Snow Crop Marketers Division of Clinton Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API