Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Snow Crop Marketers Division of Clinton Foods, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1953No. 7969PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, Justice.

The Mark Means Company and Snow Crop Marketers Division of Clinton Foods, Inc., carried on their respective and separate businesses in adjoining buildings in Lewiston. The latter Company processed and sold food.

The employees of one or the other Company, when not employed by their main employer, worked for the other. Claimant was employed regularly as warehouse foreman by the Means Company. July 6, 1952 was a rush period for the Snow Crop Company and the Means Company not being open on that day, claimant was employed by the Snow Crop Company on the tray line and his period of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Walker v. HydeIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  5. D'Amico v. ConguistaWashington Supreme Court · 1946

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitehurst v. Rainbo Baking CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Krause v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  3. South v. Bonner County School District No. 82Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lynch Special Services v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re SouthIdaho Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API