Legal Opinion
Pauley v. Industrial Commission
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1973No. 11039-PRPublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Justice.
On petitioner’s claim for compensation .the Arizona Industrial Commission entered an award denying benefits. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 18 Ariz.App. 137, 500 P.2d 1125 (1972). Opinion of the Court of Appeals vacated and the award of the Industrial Commission affirmed.... Two questions are raised for our determination: the first is whether petitioner was “hired” in Arizona within the meaning of A.R.S. § 23-904, subsec. A.
Respondent employer, H. A. Leavitt Attractions, Inc., is the owner and operator of a traveling carnival whose business is conducted in the smaller…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kobe v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Royall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Butler v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1937
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Dupper v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. Superior Court, in & for County of MaricopaArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Fisher Contracting Co. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.