Legal Opinion

Bountiful Brick Co. v. Giles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 20, 1928No. 193PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland

The question for determination is whether the Utah Workmen’s Compensation Act (Comp. Laws, Utah, 1917, § 3133, and subsequent amendments), which .provides compensation for personal injury or death of an employee by accident “ arising out of or in the course of his employment,” as it was construed and applied to the facts by the court below, contravenes the due process of law clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

It is difficult to make a satisfactory statement of the facts from the evidence because of the absence from the record of a plat of the premises which was used before the state…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cudahy Packing Co. Of Nebraska v. ParramoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Daltry v. Media Electric Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Procaccino v. E. Horton & SonsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. Starr Piano Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Voehl v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Harless v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API