Legal Opinion

Pfrimmer v. Tidwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1952No. 35647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This case is now before this court a second time, the former appeal being Pfrimmer v. Tid-well, reported in 205 Okla. 262, 236 P. 2d 978.

The plaintiffs below, Tidwell and Thomas, recovered judgment for the principal sum of $925 as brokers’ commission in securing a purchaser for certain real estate belonging to the defendant, Pfrimmer. Upon petition for rehearing in this court, said defendant objected to affirmance of the judgment on the ground that plaintiffs had not shown compliance with the Intangible Personal Property Tax Laws (68 O.S. 1941 §1501 et seq.). Thereupon, this court ordered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bath v. DumasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Abraham v. Stewart Bros. Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Waters v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  2. W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API