Legal Opinion
Pfrimmer v. Tidwell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1950No. 33575PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, C.J.
This is an appeal from a verdict and judgment in favor of defendants in error, John E. Tid-well and J. R. Thomas, partners, plaintiffs in the lower court, against plaintiff in error, M. T. Pfrimmer, defendant in the lower court, in the amount of $925. The parties will -be referred to as they appeared in the court below.
Plaintiffs brought this action in the district court of Muskogee county, Oklahoma, to recover $925 alleged to be due them as a broker’s commission on the sale of certain property. The defendant answered by a general denial. The evidence showed that in August, 1946, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scully v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- State Nat. Bank of Shawnee v. Wood Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Mayor v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Wewoka Petroleum Corporation v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Marten v. Credit Adjustment Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Briggs v. McAdams Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.