Legal Opinion

Mead v. Hellams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1951No. 34033PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

J. E. Hellams, Jr., recovered judgment against Emma I. Mead for the contract price of repairs made on the defendant’s building, and for the foreclosure of lien for services performed and materials furnished, and the defendant appeals.

This is a second appeal arising from the action. In the first appeal, in Mead v. Hellams, 200 Okla. 381, 194 P. 2d 603, this court vacated a former judgment of like terms as that mentioned above, which former judgment was rendered in 1946. In that former appeal we found and held that the plaintiff, by competent evidence, had established his case on the merits,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Lewis v. BoiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Mead v. HellamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API