Legal Opinion
Abraham v. Stewart Bros. Cotton Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 12, 1933No. 20619PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.
Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to. as plaintiff, commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county, against Joe Abraham, doing business as the Bristow Cotton Oil Company, to recover damages for the breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of 1,000 bales of cotton. The contract is in writing, dated August 28, 1926, and is as follows:
“Shawnee, Oklahoma,
“August 28, 1926.
“Bristow Cotton Oil Company,
Bristow, Oklahoma.
“ Confirmation.
“Dear Sir:
“We beg to confirm having purchased from you as follows:
“Quantity: One thousand (1000) bales of cotton.
“ Grade: Basis middling…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. LivelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Mashburn v. City of GrandfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Walker Drilling Co. v. Carlew Drilling ContractorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Travelers Fire Ins. Co. v. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- Ottinger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Daisy D. Blankenship v. Maxwell RowntreeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Mud Products, Inc. v. GutowskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.