Legal Opinion

W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1957No. 5539_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Upon an earlier consideration of this case on appeal, 237 F.2d 630, this court set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee upon the sole ground that appellee had failed to allege and prove compliance with the provisions of the Oklahoma intangible property tax law, 1 such compliance being a jurisdictional prerequisite to recovery upon a cause of action involving a promissory note. Pfrimmer v. Tidwell, 207 Okl. 605, 252 P.2d 123; Pfrimmer v. Tidwell, 205 Okl. 262, 236 P.2d 978; Edmonds v. White, 203 Okl. 231, 219 P.2d 1007. The mandate read:

“The judgment below is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bastian v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  2. Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  3. Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  4. W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  5. The United States of America v. Edward Paul WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  2. Northern Natural Gas Company, Helex Group v. O.W. Hegler, Landowner Group, and Mobil Oil Corporation, Lessee-Producer GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Mogg v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API