W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
Upon an earlier consideration of this case on appeal, 237 F.2d 630, this court set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee upon the sole ground that appellee had failed to allege and prove compliance with the provisions of the Oklahoma intangible property tax law, 1 such compliance being a jurisdictional prerequisite to recovery upon a cause of action involving a promissory note. Pfrimmer v. Tidwell, 207 Okl. 605, 252 P.2d 123; Pfrimmer v. Tidwell, 205 Okl. 262, 236 P.2d 978; Edmonds v. White, 203 Okl. 231, 219 P.2d 1007. The mandate read:
“The judgment below is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bastian v. EricksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Edmonds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Pfrimmer v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- The United States of America v. Edward Paul WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- R. E. B., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Northern Natural Gas Company, Helex Group v. O.W. Hegler, Landowner Group, and Mobil Oil Corporation, Lessee-Producer GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mogg v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Ostano Commerzanstalt v. Telewide Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.