Bartholomew v. Loy
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This was a complaint for a new trial under section 356, 2 G. & H. 215.- A demurrer to the complaint, because it did not contain facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action or for a new trial, was sustained, an excep*394tion taken, and on the appellants’ declining to amend, Judgment was rendered against them, and for costs. The error assigned is, that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer.
The complaint sets out the issues, a trial by the court, finding and judgment for the appellees, in the action in which the new trial is sought to be obtained. It is also averred that Fuller, one of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State ex rel. Druliner v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Simpson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Bronson v. HickmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Rater v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Ragsdale v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hiatt v. BallingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- O'Dea v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.