Legal Opinion
Hines v. Driver
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1885No. 10,644PublishedCited by 79 opinions
From the Hamilton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellee’s complaint seeks a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Its sufficiency was questioned by a demurrer in the court below, and the appellants insist that their demurrer ought to have been sustained.
The case has already received consideration upon a motion made by the appellee to dismiss the appeal, and it was then held, after a very careful and full investigation, that a proceeding seeking a new trial, commenced after the expiration of the term, Avas an independent one. Hines v. Driver, 89 Ind. 339. We have no doubt of the correctness of the conclusion then…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Bayless v. GlennIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Southard v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Cassaday v. American Ins.Indiana Supreme Court · 1880
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Avery v. DoughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Donahue v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Reynolds v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1895
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.