Legal Opinion

Ragsdale v. Matthews

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1884No. 10,743PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

— The appellants filed their complaint in the court below for a new trial, under section 563, R. S. 1881, on account of newly discovered evidence, after the close of the term at which the judgment complained of was rendered.

It appears from the complaint that the suit in the former case was upon a promissory note executed by the appellants to the appellee’s intestate. Upon the issues in that case arising on pleas of payment and set-off, there was a trial which resulted in a judgment for the administrator.

The newly discovered (evidence, set out in the appellants’ complaint for a new trial,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cox v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Reno v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Bartholomew v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Nordman v. StoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hamm v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Cheek v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ward v. VorisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. McKernan v. EstabrookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API