Legal Opinion

Glidewell v. Daggy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1863PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

The plaintiff calls his suit, by name, one for a review and rehearing. And in the complaint he filed, he evidently shows that he was confounding, in his mind, the two remedies of a suit for a review, and a suit for a new trial, when he filed it. But the only part of a case he makes falls within the provision of the statute, authorizing the granting of trials after the expiration of the term. ¥e shall treat the case as one, for the obtaining of such new trial, under sec. 356, p. 215, 2 G. & H.

New trials may be granted for any legal cause during the term at which the original trial is had,…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API