Legal Opinion

Hiatt v. Ballinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 6 opinions

¡From-the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— On the 23d day of April, 1875, the appellant filed in the court below his complaint, duly verified, for a new trial, under the provisions of section 356 of the practice act. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 183.

We set out the substance of this complaint, as follows:

The appellant moved the court for a new trial of a certain cause, whereiu he was the defendant, and the appellee was the plaintiff', upon the following grounds, to wit:

1. That the appellant was not aware of the kind and character of the evidence intended to be introduced on the trial of said cause by the appellee; that the appellant was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Cox v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Bartholomew v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. McKernan v. EstabrookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API