Hiatt v. Ballinger
Indiana Supreme Court
¡From-the Grant Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
— On the 23d day of April, 1875, the appellant filed in the court below his complaint, duly verified, for a new trial, under the provisions of section 356 of the practice act. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 183.
We set out the substance of this complaint, as follows:
The appellant moved the court for a new trial of a certain cause, whereiu he was the defendant, and the appellee was the plaintiff', upon the following grounds, to wit:
1. That the appellant was not aware of the kind and character of the evidence intended to be introduced on the trial of said cause by the appellee; that the appellant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Cox v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Rickart v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Bartholomew v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Morrison v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- McKernan v. EstabrookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.