Legal Opinion

Rickart v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from the Warren Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

This was a complaint to obtain a new trial for newly-discovered evidence. A demurrer was sustained to the complaint, to which the appellants excepted; and declining to amend, judgment was rendered against them for costs. They appeal to this court and assign for error:

1. Sustaining the demurrer to the complaint.

2. Sustaining the appellees’ motion for judgment for costs.

3. Rendering judgment in favor of appellees.

The complaint does not expressly state what were the issues in the cause which had been tried. The pleadings in that cause are not before us, nor are their contents stated. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glidewell v. DaggyIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Coe v. GivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Ruger v. BunganIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Mason v. PalmertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  5. McKee v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Rich v. StarbuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. East v. McKeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Gardner v. State ex rel. StottlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Rater v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API