Legal Opinion

Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Schroll

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1907No. 15,086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Harvey district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Graves, J.:

This is an action brought by defendant in error to recover damages on account of injuries sustained by him while engaged as an employee of the plaintiff in error in the capacity of a. hostler helper at Newton.

When the action was called for trial the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence under the *573petition, for the reason that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This objection was sustained, upon the ground that the service of notice upon the defendant as required by chapter 393 of the Laws of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ryan v. TudorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Irwin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Losch v. PickettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  5. Stone v. YoungSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Horton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  2. City of Ottawa v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Cherokee Grain Co. v. Elk City Flour Mills Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Gannaway v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API