Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motions for Rehearing. The defendants in error, plaintiffs below, filed motions for a hearing, which the court overruled at its session in October, 1888. The facts are stated in TJ. P. Ely. Co. v. Hutchinson, 39 Kas. 485, et seq., and in the opinion herein.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoeton, C. J.:
The plaintiffs below ask a rehearing in these cases on the ground, as they contend, that the opinions reversing the judgments are not in harmony with the settled principles of law.
Upon the trial, the jury returned a general verdict in favor of plaintiffs, with answers to interrogatories submitted. Among the answers to the interrogatories are:
“1. How wide was the street on which engine 311 stood? Ans.: 100 feet.
“2. How much of the street was occupied by the engine? A. About 35 feet.
“3. Was there room for teams to pass? A. Yes.
“4. How long…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Turner v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Thompson v. Cincinnati, Lafayette & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Ottawa v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Jones v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SchrollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Gannaway v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
- Colwell v. ParkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.