Legal Opinion

City of Ottawa v. Heathman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 30, 1984No. 56,724PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lockett, J.:

This is an appeal by the condemnor in a condemnation action from an order granting a new trial to the landowner.

The City of Ottawa, Kansas (the City), filed an appeal of an appraiser’s award for land in Ottawa owned by Frederick Junior and Mildred L. Heathman (Heathmans), which was condemned for a permanent construction easement. Trial was held and a verdict reached on August 31, 1983. The jury instruction given by the trial court for determining the Heathmans’ damages for the City’s taking of their land was:

“The measure of compensation for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Perry v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  2. Kincaid v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. State v. GoeringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  4. Timmerman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Ryan v. TudorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Moore v. State Bank of BurdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  3. Saucedo v. WingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. Cornwell v. JespersenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  5. Hagedorn Ex Rel. Hagedorn v. Stormont-Vail Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API