Gannaway v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Foth, J.:
This is an action by a railroad worker against his employer under the federal Safety Appliance Acts. A jury returned a general verdict for $150,000.00. The defendant appeals raising four points concerning the amount of the verdict, the manner in which it was reached, and the elements of damage submitted to the jury.
1. Defendant’s first and primary claim of error is based on the fact that the trial court gave the jury no tables or mathematical formulae for reducing lost future earnings to present worth, as the court’s instructions required it to do. The issue was raised below only…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Francis v. Heater v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Edward J. Russell v. City of WildwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Haddigan v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Clyde H. Duncan v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cott v. Peppermint Twist Management Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1993
- Gregory v. CareySupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- City of Ottawa v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Cornejo v. ProbstCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- Randall J. Miller, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.