Ryan v. Tudor
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. Action by Ryan against Tudor and wife, upon four promissory notes, amounting to $900, with interest, and to foreclose a mortgage given to secure their payment. Trial at the May Term, 1883, and judgment for defendants. Ryan brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
This was an action upon four notes and a mortgage given to secure their payment, commenced in tne district court of Clay county on February 17, 1882. The mortgage was executed May 7, 1876. On the 20th of March, and before answering, the defendants filed their motion to require the plaintiff’s attorneys to produce the authority under which they appeared for the plaintiff. Affidavits were read on the hearing of this motion; the court found that the attorneys had not sufficient authority, and continued the case to the next term. At the next…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Tisdale v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
- Irwin v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gero v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
- Pepperall v. City Park Transit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Ottawa v. HeathmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Cox v. EllsworthNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Dolan v. Van DemarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.