Legal Opinion
Aagard v. Palomar Builders, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 16, 2004No. CIV.S-04-0825 FCDDADPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAMRELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on plaintiff and counterclaim defendant Jane E. Aagard’s (“Aagard”) motion to dismiss counterclaims three through seven, brought by defendants and counterclaim-ants Palomar Builders, Inc., Jeffrey D. Allen, Sue Tsai, Palomar Construction Co., and Todd Selk (collectively, “Palomar”), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1
Aagard asserts that Palomar’s counterclaims fail to state a claim for relief for misappropriation; unlawful business practices, pursuant to Cal. Bus. & Prof.Code §§ 17200…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cruz v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Institute of Cetacean Research v. Sea Shepherd Conservation SocietyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Alaskasland.com, LLC v. CrossAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Media.net Advertising FZ-LLC v. NetSeer, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Rutledge v. High Point Regional Health SystemDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Polacsek v. Debticated Consumer Counseling, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.