Polacsek v. Debticated Consumer Counseling, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
A key question in this case is whether a credit counseling agency (CCA) is subject to the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. § 1679 et seq. The Court holds that, depending on the circumstances, it may be. 1
The Court further holds, as a matter of law, that Debticated Consumer Counseling, Inc. (Debticated), the only CCA Defendant in this case, will be subject to CROA if it is determined at trial that, directly or indirectly, it operated de facto as a for-profit corporation. The fact that Debticated or any CCA may have been organized as a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Zimmerman v. PuccioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
- Zimmermann v. Cambridge Credit Counseling Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Greene v. CCDN, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
- Plattner v. Edge Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.