Legal Opinion
Norton v. Bassett
California Supreme Court
Decided September 29, 1910No. L.A. No. 2406PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
On the former appeal in this case (Norton v. Bassett, 154 Cal. 411, [97 Pac. 894]) it was held that the statute of limitations barred the prosecution of this action by the beneficiaries out of possession. The facts will be found fully stated in the opinion handed down in that case. After this decision plaintiffs undertook in the trial court to change their complaint so as to obviate the difficulty and remove the bar of the statute by amendments to the following effect:—
“That said plaintiffs have been in possession of said lands from the time the same were purchased as aforesaid up to the date…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Norton v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Brittan v. Oakland Bank of SavingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Crosby v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bank of Woodland v. HeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Holt v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- California Casualty General Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Lortz v. ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Daum v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SUTTER CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Hopkins v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Saari v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.