Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Hopkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 18, 1953No. Civ. 19165PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATROSSO, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff instituted this action on September 19, 1950, by filing a complaint in two counts. The first alleges that on October 18, 1926, plaintiff and defendant, being then husband and wife, entered into a written property settlement agreement under the terms of which defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a sum of $120 per month for so long as she lived or until she remarried, and $30 per month for the support of the three minor children of the parties; that plaintiff has not remarried; that on May 9, 1927, the marriage between the parties was dissolved by a decree of divorce…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  5. Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hsu v. Mt. Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Richter v. RichterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API