Hopkins v. Hopkins
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PATROSSO, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff instituted this action on September 19, 1950, by filing a complaint in two counts. The first alleges that on October 18, 1926, plaintiff and defendant, being then husband and wife, entered into a written property settlement agreement under the terms of which defendant agreed to pay plaintiff a sum of $120 per month for so long as she lived or until she remarried, and $30 per month for the support of the three minor children of the parties; that plaintiff has not remarried; that on May 9, 1927, the marriage between the parties was dissolved by a decree of divorce…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Brownrigg v. DefreesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Rudd v. ByrnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Hsu v. Mt. Zion HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Richter v. RichterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.